Legal Opinion
Hale v. Wilmarth
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 7, 1931PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.
In this suit in equity the plaintiff, the executor of the will of Mrs. Blackinton, a deceased member of a partnership, seeks to have declared void a provision in the partnership agreement between the testatrix and the defendants that upon her death her interest in the partnership should become the property of the defendants. The report of the master was confirmed by an interlocutory decree from which the plaintiff appealed. Á final decree was entered, dismissing the bill. The plaintiff appealed.
The testatrix was the defendants’ aunt. Her husband, at the time of his death in 1888, carried on…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chippendale v. North Adams Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Marble v. Treasurer & Receiver GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Battles v. Millbury Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Krell v. CodmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Brodrick v. O'ConnorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Blanchette v. BlanchetteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- Malden Trust Co. v. BrooksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- United States v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- New England Trust Co. v. SpauldingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Kavanaugh v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.