Legal Opinion

State v. Alvord

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 10, 1993No. 91-20231; CA A71484PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

A jury convicted defendant of prostitution on the allegation that he knowingly offered or agreed to pay a fee to engage in sexual conduct or sexual contact. ORS l^.OC^UXb). We reverse.

Defendant assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal. There was evidence that he offered to pay a fee for sexual conduct. ORS 167.007(l)(b). The trial court did not err.

Defendant also assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion for mistrial based on the prosecutor’s opening statement. In the opening statement, the prosecutor told the jury, after recounting a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. WaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. State v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. VeatchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. State v. OsornoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. State v. RaglandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. Albertson's, Inc. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. Resources Northwest, Inc. v. CrothersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API