Legal Opinion

State v. Osorno

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 13, 2014No. 120444112; A151949PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, J.

A jury convicted defendant of driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII), reckless driving, and failure to perform the duties of a driver when property is damaged. At trial, the prosecutor elicited testimony regarding defendant’s invocation of her right to remain silent, despite a pretrial ruling that such evidence was inadmissible. The trial court denied defendant’s motions for a mistrial and for a new trial based on its conclusion that, although the elicitation of the testimony was clearly improper, it did not prejudice defendant’s right to a fair trial. We agree with defendant that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lakeside v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. FarrarOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. SmallwoodOregon Supreme Court · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. State v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. State v. ReinekeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. State v. SchumacherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  5. State v. SellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API