State v. Osorno
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, J.
A jury convicted defendant of driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII), reckless driving, and failure to perform the duties of a driver when property is damaged. At trial, the prosecutor elicited testimony regarding defendant’s invocation of her right to remain silent, despite a pretrial ruling that such evidence was inadmissible. The trial court denied defendant’s motions for a mistrial and for a new trial based on its conclusion that, although the elicitation of the testimony was clearly improper, it did not prejudice defendant’s right to a fair trial. We agree with defendant that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lakeside v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. FarrarOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. SmallwoodOregon Supreme Court · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. ReinekeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. SchumacherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- State v. SellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.