United States v. Schack
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
The defendant moves to dismiss an indictment, charging him with evasion of 1951 income taxes, on the ground that prosecution is barred by the statute of limitations. The limitation period is six years which may be extended for nine .months “where a complaint is instituted .before a commissioner of the United ¡States within the [six year] period «* * * » 1
The parties are in accord that unless the statute was tolled, prosecution was barred on February 4, 1958. On the previous day, February 3, 1958, a grand jury before which evidence had been presented for several days,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Lawn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- United States v. Frank CostelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Robert Hawthorne, Inc. v. Director of Internal RevenueDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- In Re Grand Jury Investigation of Banana IndustryDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1963
- United States v. MelekhDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1961
- Arlington Glass Co. v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1959
- United States v. GakoumisDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.