Legal Opinion

In Re Grand Jury Investigation of Banana Industry

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided March 8, 1963No. Misc. 156PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMSEN, Chief Judge.

A motion filed herein by the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (the Division) requires the Court to construe and apply Rule 6(e), F.R.Crim.P., which reads in pertinent part: “Disclosure of matters occurring before the grand jury other than its deliberations and the vote of any juror may be made to the attorneys for the government for use in the performance of their duties. Otherwise a juror, attorney, interpreter or stenographer may disclose matters occurring before the grand jury only when so directed by the court preliminarily to or in connection with a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Blair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. United States v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. HolmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. United States v. MalatestaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. United States v. LawsonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1980
  4. United States v. Braniff Airways, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1977
  5. United States v. AnzelmoDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1970

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API