Legal Opinion
Raithaus v. UNUM Life Ins. Co. of America
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided July 16, 2004No. CIV. 03-00186ACKKSCPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KAY, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Lawrence' Raithaus, M.D. (“Plaintiff’ or “Dr. Raithaus”) filed this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B) (“ERISA”) against Defendant UNUM Life Insurance Company of America (“Defendant” or “UNUM”). The Complaint claims that Defendant wrongfully denied Plaintiffs long-term disability benefits. The parties have…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Perryman v. Provident Life and Accident Ins. Co.District Court, D. Arizona · 2010
- Karlin v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2010
- Doe v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Doe v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Towner v. Cigna Life Ins. Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2006