Gano v. Gano
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Head, Justice.
There can be no doubt, under decisions of this court, but that a corporation has the exclusive right to the use of its own name; or that it may acquire a trade name descriptive of its goods or services that will be protected in a court of equity. Saunders System v. Drive It Yourself Co., 158 Ga. 1 (123 S. E. 132); Rome Mach. Co. v. Davis Foundry Co., 135 Ga. 17 (68 S. E. 800). A person may acquire a trade name so descriptive of his goods or services that it will be protected in a court of equity. Saunders System v. Drive It Yourself Co., supra.
The plaintiffs in error (plaintiffs…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jones v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Saunders System Atlanta Co. v. Drive It Yourself Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Bowman v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Atlanta Paper Co. v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Rome Machine & Foundry Co. v. Davis Foundry & Machine WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Akron Pest Control v. Radar Exterminating Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Attaway v. DuncanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Kay Jewelry Co. v. KapiloffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
- Gordy v. DunwodySupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
- Dolphin Homes Corporation v. Tocomc Develop. Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.