Legal Opinion

Gano v. Gano

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 13, 1948No. 16083PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

There can be no doubt, under decisions of this court, but that a corporation has the exclusive right to the use of its own name; or that it may acquire a trade name descriptive of its goods or services that will be protected in a court of equity. Saunders System v. Drive It Yourself Co., 158 Ga. 1 (123 S. E. 132); Rome Mach. Co. v. Davis Foundry Co., 135 Ga. 17 (68 S. E. 800). A person may acquire a trade name so descriptive of his goods or services that it will be protected in a court of equity. Saunders System v. Drive It Yourself Co., supra.

The plaintiffs in error (plaintiffs…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jones v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  2. Saunders System Atlanta Co. v. Drive It Yourself Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  3. Bowman v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  4. Atlanta Paper Co. v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  5. Rome Machine & Foundry Co. v. Davis Foundry & Machine WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Akron Pest Control v. Radar Exterminating Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  2. Attaway v. DuncanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  3. Kay Jewelry Co. v. KapiloffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  4. Gordy v. DunwodySupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  5. Dolphin Homes Corporation v. Tocomc Develop. Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API