Gordy v. Dunwody
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Chief Justice.
That the petitioner by long use and registration had acquired a right to the trade-mark and trade name “The Varsity,” is clearly shown by the petition. Therefore, at the outset it is necessary to determine whether or not this trade name and trade-mark of the petitioner is infringed and imitated by the trade name of the defendants, which is “Varsity Drive-in.” It is readily seen that the word “Varsity” is common to both and the other words in each are relatively unimportant, and undoubtedly some people would confuse the two and conclude that they were the same, but…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Creswill v. Grand Lodge Knights of PythiasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Consolidated Distributors Inc. v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Womble v. ParkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Emory v. Grand United Order of Odd FellowsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Kay Jewelry Co. v. KapiloffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hayes v. Hallmark ApartmentsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Miller & Meier & Associates v. DiedrichCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Stuart Enterprises International, Inc. v. Peykan, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Turpin v. WorleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Reis v. RallsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.