Legal Opinion
Willis v. Cool
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided September 1, 1982No. 78-0300-CV-W-9PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BARTLETT, District Judge.
Plaintiff James A. Willis contends that defendants Bert Cool, Sylvester Young and James Campbell, all former Kansas City, Missouri police officers, deprived him of his constitutional “rights to security of person and freedom from arrest, except upon probable cause, guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and his rights not to be deprived of liberty without due process of law, guaranteed by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.” Complaint ¶ 13. Jurisdiction was premised on 42 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Doe v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Edmond v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1989
- McGhee v. POTTAWATTAMIE COUNTY, IADistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2007
- James Arthur Willis v. Bert W. Cool, Sylvester Young, Sr., and James F. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983