Legal Opinion

James Arthur Willis v. Bert W. Cool, Sylvester Young, Sr., and James F. Campbell

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 19, 1983No. 82-2245PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff claims that three Kansas City, Missouri police officers deprived him of federally protected rights by knowingly causing him to be indicted for murder on the basis of perjured testimony before a grand jury. (Plaintiff was later acquitted at trial.) After plaintiff rested in the § 1983 civil trial, the District Court 1 granted defendants’ motion for a directed verdict.

The District Court later fully explained its reasons in a published opinion, Willis v. Cool, 546 F.Supp. 458 (W.D.Mo.1982). It held, first of all, that plaintiff’s complaint failed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Willis v. CoolDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Doe v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  2. Edmond v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API