Legal Opinion
Michael Pottinger, Peter Carter, Berry Young v. City of Miami
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided December 7, 1994No. 91-5316, 92-5145PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HATCHETT, Circuit Judge:
In this class action lawsuit on behalf of homeless persons in the Miami, Florida area, we remand for limited purposes, including clarification of the terms of the injunction and an update of the facts.
FACTS
A group of homeless persons filed a class action lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida alleging that the City of Miami, Florida (the city), has a policy of harassing homeless people for sleeping, eating, and performing life sustaining activities in public places. In addition, the class asserted that the city routinely seizes and destroys its members’ property…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Joe Rodger Newell, Jr., Individually and as Natural Parent and Guardian of Minor Joe Rodger Newell, Iii. v. Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
3Cited by12 opinions
- James S. Joel v. City of OrlandoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- JONES v. CITY OF LOS ANGELESCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- K.L. v. ValdezDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1996
- David Peery v. City of MiamiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Hill v. ButterworthCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.