Legal Opinion

Hill v. Butterworth

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 15, 1997No. 97-2192PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HATCHETT, Chief Judge:

The important issue in this case is whether the district court erred in ruling that the State of Florida has not achieved “opt-in” status pursuant to the provisions of the Anti-terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. Because of substantial changes in circumstances since the district court’s rulings, we remand the ease to the district court for further proceedings.

When President Clinton signed the AED-PA into law, he expressed his hope that its first title would “streamline Federal appeals for convicted criminals…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Mata v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  3. Hill v. ButterworthDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1996
  4. Ashmus v. CalderonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. Michael Pottinger, Peter Carter, Berry Young v. City of MiamiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hill v. ButterworthCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API