Swanson v. Hodges
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.
Special ground 3 of the amended motion for new trial complains that the trial court erred in admitting in evidence, over the defendant’s objection, a “proposal” by the plaintiff to construct a house for a certain price. The proposal was not signed although spaces were provided for the signatures of the contractor and the owner. An examination of the record does not disclose that the purpose for which such evidence was *541admitted was limited in any way by the trial court, either by instructions to the jury at the time the evidence was admitted or in the charge to the jury.
In Denton v. Etheridge,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Teasley v. BradleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Akers v. Kirke & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Denton v. EtheridgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
- Moorefield v. Fidelity Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Purvis v. Atlanta Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. HickmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Gordon v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Chandler v. Alabama Power CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Jones v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Butts v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.