Legal Opinion

County Board of Commissioners v. Holliday

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 8, 1937No. 14431PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Stabler.

In 1887, one J. E. Tindal conveyed to the trustees of Zero Church in Clarendon County, “for the purpose of a burial ground and place of worship”, eight acres of land, one of the conditions of the sale and transfer being that the property would revert to the grantor, his heirs or assigns, when no longer used for the purposes named in the deed. In 1892, one Rufus C. Lackey also sold to the trustees of this church •one acre of land adjoining the eight acres purchased from Tindal, the entire tract being dedicated and devoted to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Evergreen Cemetery Ass'n v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1875
  2. Memphis State Line Railroad v. Forest Hill Cemetery Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Starr Burying Ground Asso. v. North Lane Cemetery Asso.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
  4. Columbia Water Power Co. v. NunamakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
  5. Seabrook v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Beth Medrosh Hagodol v. City of AuroraSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
  2. Thornberry v. State Board of RegentsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  3. Riley v. South Carolina State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  4. Zero Church v. BrittonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  5. Greenwood County v. WatkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API