Legal Opinion

Pearce v. Scott

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 5, 1928No. 4683PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from a decree in the Supreme Court of the District enjoining appellant (defendant below) “from the further maintenance of any obstruction or interference with the natural flow or drainage of water from the lands of plaintiff” (appellee here), and for the damages sustained.

The parties are adjoining lot owners in that section of the District of Columbia known as Anaeostia. The lots slope in the same direction, the lot of the defendant being lower than that of thó plaintiff, so that surface water resulting from rain or melting snow originally flowed from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Fifth Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Walker v. New Mexico & Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ortberg v. Goldman Sachs GroupDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. United States v. Shapiro, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  3. United States v. Shapiro, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API