Legal Opinion

Chapin v. Fairchild Camera & Instrument Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 20, 1973No. Civ. 29866PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TAYLOR, P. J.

This appeal by certain former salaried and hourly employees (Employees) of the Memory Products Department (Memory Products) of respondent, Fairchild Camera and Instrument Corporation (Fair-child), from an adverse judgment after a court trial, presents a question of first impression in this state as to the nature of severance and in lieu of notice benefits 1 in a contract of employment. For the reasons set forth below, we have concluded that the trial court erred in concluding that Fairchild’s sale of Memory Products was not a termination of employment that would entitle…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Adams v. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  2. Chinn v. China National Aviation Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. MacE v. Conde Nast Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  4. Matthews v. Minnesota Tribune Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  5. Alexander v. AngelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Blau v. Del Monte Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. Harry Jung, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Fmc Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. Dahl v. Brunswick Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. Bruch v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  5. Thomas W. Gresham v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API