Legal Opinion

Golubski Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 1952No. Appeal, 127PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Arnold, J.,

The various claimants here were denied unemployment compensation and took this appeal. They were employes of the American Bridge Company at its Ambridge plant, and the employer gave notice on January 11,1950, that the plant would be closed from July 10 through July 23, 1950, for the purpose of taking inventory. As the result of this the claimants were unemployed during the periods of time set forth herein. They registered with the bureau and were prima facie entitled to unemployment compensation. Their unemployment was the result of a shutdown by the Bridge Company for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mattey v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Schettino v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  3. American Bridge Co. v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. Hassey v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Bennett v. HixWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Susquehanna Collieries Division v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Beaman v. BenchArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  4. General Electric Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Johnson v. LaGrange Shoe CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API