Legal Opinion
State v. Woveris
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided December 15, 1993No. 91-444PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.
The defendant, William Woveris, appeals the Superior Court’s (Dickson, J.) decision revoking his probation, arguing that the State failed to adduce sufficient evidence to establish that the defendant violated his probation by not meaningfully participating in counseling. We affirm.
On March 15,1989, the defendant pled guilty to two counts of felonious sexual assault, contrary to RSA 632-A:3 (1986). Pursuant to a negotiated plea, Woveris was sentenced in part to five years probation with a special condition requiring him to participate in sex offender treatment. Subsequently, the defendant was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. GleasonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- State v. PeckSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
- State v. FieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
- State v. IngersonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. CarlsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- State v. KochviSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
- Covington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1997
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
- State v. HerndonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.