Legal Opinion

State v. Ingerson

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 4, 1987No. 86-179PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.

The question before us today is whether two convictions may be called forward for imposition and execution of sentences, two years and nine months after the original sentencing, when the trial court did not inform the defendant how long the continuance or suspension would remain in effect. The Nashua District Court (Pantelas, J.) imposed such sentences, and the Superior Court (Dalianis, J.) denied the defendant’s petition for certiorari. We reverse and remand to the superior court for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

On January 21, 1982, the defendant pleaded no contest to two…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stapleford v. PerrinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  2. State v. BurroughsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  3. State Ex Rel. Buckley v. DrewSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1909
  4. Sylvester v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1889
  5. State v. RauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. BudgettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  2. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  3. State v. BurgessSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  4. State v. MateySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  5. State v. WoverisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API