Legal Opinion
Paragon Technologies, Inc. v. InfoSmart Technologies, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 9, 2011No. A11A1237PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, Presiding Judge.
Paragon Technologies, Inc. (“Paragon”) appeals from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment to InfoSmart Technologies, Inc. (“InfoSmart”) in this case involving a restrictive covenant. Paragon asserts that the trial court erred by finding the restrictive covenant unenforceable as a matter of law. We disagree and affirm.
Summary judgment is proper when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). “A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Jenkins v. Jenkins Irrigation, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Advance Technology Consultants, Inc. v. RoadTrac, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Waldeck v. Curtis 1000, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Swartz Investments, LLC v. Vion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- UWork.Com, Inc. v. Paragon Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Carson v. Obor Holding Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Daniel B. Buffkin v. Glacier GroupIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Ryanne Early v. Mimedx Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- VULCAN STEEL STRUCTURES, INC. Et Al. v. McCARTY Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.