Legal Opinion

Amguard Insurance Company v. Cantrell III

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided March 24, 2025No. 6:23-cv-03267Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION AMGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 6:23-cv-03267-MDH ) JAMES CANTRELL, III ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. (Doc. 79). Defendant has filed his suggestions in support (Doc. 80), Plaintiff has filed its suggestions in opposition (Doc. 88), and Defendant has filed his reply. (Doc. 91). The motion is now ripe for adjudication. For the reasons stated herein, Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Quinn v. St. Louis CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API