In re Waite
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Garrett, Presiding Judge,
delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:
Appellants seek review and reversal of tbe decision of the Board of Appeals of tbe United States Patent Office affirming that of the Primary Examiner rejecting the twenty-eight claims of their application relating to alleged new and useful improvements in vitreoüs •enamel opacifiers, “more particularly to compositions suitable for use as mill addition opaquing or opacifying agents, in conjunction with pre-smelted enamel frit and other constituents of an enamel mix, for production of white vitreous or porcelain enamels especially.” No…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Application of SelmiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- In re SwensonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
- In re LeeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
- In re ModineCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
- In Re EbertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Application of ArbeitCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
- Application of Basil Vivian Aller, Richard Norman Lacey, Reginald Harold HallCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
- Pullman Inc. v. ACF Industries Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Van Brode Milling Co. v. Cox Air Gauge System, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1958
- In Re DavisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.