Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lockcuff

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 12, 2002PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, J.:

¶ 1 In this Commonwealth appeal challenging the trial court’s order granting defendant/appellee’s pretrial motion to preclude evidence, we examine Pennsylvania Rule of Evidence 404(b), specifically, the identity exception of the Rule.1 After *859careful consideration of the facts and relevant law, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

¶ 2 This case concerns defendant/appel-lee Dennis Lockcuff, who was charged with arson2 and related offenses3 in the fall of 1999. At that time, Lockcuff owned a commercial property in South Williams-port. The building housed a diner on the first…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. MatisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Commonwealth v. SamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Commonwealth v. BurtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Commonwealth v. RogersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ArdingerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. HunterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Com. v. Betts, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Com. v. Brewer, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. Com. v. Deiuliis, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API