Commonwealth v. Lockcuff
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, J.:
¶ 1 In this Commonwealth appeal challenging the trial court’s order granting defendant/appellee’s pretrial motion to preclude evidence, we examine Pennsylvania Rule of Evidence 404(b), specifically, the identity exception of the Rule.1 After *859careful consideration of the facts and relevant law, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
¶ 2 This case concerns defendant/appel-lee Dennis Lockcuff, who was charged with arson2 and related offenses3 in the fall of 1999. At that time, Lockcuff owned a commercial property in South Williams-port. The building housed a diner on the first…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. MatisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. SamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. BurtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. RogersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ArdingerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. HunterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Com. v. Betts, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Com. v. Brewer, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
- Com. v. Deiuliis, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.