Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ardinger

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 23, 2003PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDel Sole, P.J.

¶ 1 This is an appeal by the Commonwealth from a pretrial order denying the Commonwealth’s motion in limine which sought to introduce evidence of a prior bad act under Pa.R.E. 404(b)(2) at Appellee’s trial.1 We reverse and remand.

*1144¶ 2 Appellee has been charged with one count each of involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, statutory sexual assault and indecent assault involving an 11-year-old boy during the period of June 1, 2000 to August 31, 2000. The boy, T.C., lived in a household with his mother, who became good friends with Appellee. The Commonwealth contends that Appellee became a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CosnekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. MinerdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. O'BrienSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Commonwealth v. GordonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Commonwealth v. LockcuffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MoserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Com. v. D.R.L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Com. v. Ford, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Com. v. Haywood, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Com. v. Smarr, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API