Legal Opinion

Brinson v. Kirby

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 14, 1959No. 166PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.

The owner of property may bring an independent action to prevent the sale of his property under execution issuing on a judgment to which he is not a party and for which he is not responsible. Mica Industries v. Penland, 249 N.C. 602, 107 S.E. 2d 120.

Appellee predicates his right to sell the crops on the theory that they were produced on land owned by the judgment debtor and plaintiff as tenants by the entirety, and as the husband was entitled, to +.be nsufmct of the land, Hie crops were his. The conclusion would not seem necessarily to follow the premise, but the case was apparently tried on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Davis v. . BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Honeycutt v. Citizens National Bank in GastoniaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Ingram v. . EasleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. Davis v. VaughnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. Mica Industries, Inc. v. PenlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. L & M GAS COMPANY v. LeggettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Combs v. CombsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Combs v. CombsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Boone v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Kanoy v. KanoyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API