DeMoulin v. Kissir
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CLEMENS, Commissioner.
The primary issue here arises from the trial court’s refusal to give defendant’s withdrawal instruction. The instruction would have directed the jury to disregard evidence of a doctor’s bill for treating the plaintiff-wife’s dislocated jaw, one of her alleged injuries. This, on the ground that plaintiffs had failed to show a causal connection between the accidental injury and the dislocation. Lesser issues concern the sufficiency of evidence to show loss of consortium, and the propriety of a hypothetical question.
The defendant negligently drove his car into the rear of…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bertram v. WunningMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
- Hotchner v. LiebowitsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
- Moore v. GlasgowMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
- Baker v. Kansas City Terminal Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Denney v. Spot Martin, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1959
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Sampson v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- Bridgeforth v. ProffittMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- Robbins v. Jewish Hospital of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Skelton v. General Candy Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Snadon v. GayerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.