Bertram v. Wunning
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DOERNER, Commissioner.
Defendant having admitted his liability for the accident which gave rise to this action, the sole issue submitted to the jury was the nature and extent, if any, of plaintiff’s resulting injuries. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $5,000, on which judgment was entered, and after an unavailing motion for a new trial defendant appealed.
The principal points raised by defendant concern the admissibility of the testimony of plaintiff’s attending physician regarding a hernia which developed subsequent to the accident, and the sufficiency of such testimony to…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kimmie v. Terminal Railroad Assn.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- O'Leary v. Scullin Steel CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
- Ketcham v. ThomasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
- Roscoe v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- Skadal v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Tompkins v. CervantesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- DeMoulin v. KissirMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
- Conlon v. RoederSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- Harrison v. WellerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
- Eiting v. GoddingNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.