Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & Potomac Tel. Co. v. Clay

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 14, 1952No. 10963_1PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR K. MILLER, Circuit Judge.

E. Bradley Clay sued The Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia for damages alleged to have been suffered because the company-breached its contract to furnish reference of telephone calls after a change in the location and number of his business telephone. The District Court’s order granting summary judgment to the Telephone Company was reversed by this court and the case was remanded. 1

At the ensuing trial, the district judge’s charge to the jury defined nominal damages as “the minimum amount…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. PrenticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Southern Express Co. v. ByersSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Connelly v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1902
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. FergusonIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Clay v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Ralph Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  2. Rieser v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  3. Sidney J. Brown v. James R. Coates, Marion E. Coates, and Margaret E. BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  4. Ronald Magnett v. Joseph Pelletier, William Rhodes, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
  5. Sheila Payne, Next Best Friend of Franklin Payne, a Minor v. Government of the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API