Clay v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BAZELON, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff1 was engaged part-time in the business of supplying orchestras for dances, weddings and banquets. One of the two telephones at his home, Georgia 6012, was used for this business and was advertised in the classified directory. When plaintiff’s wife secured employment in downtown Washington and was no longer able to take calls at the Georgia number, plaintiff requested that the advertised number be reassigned to his wife’s place of employment. Although his request was denied, because it involved a transfer outside the Georgia exchange area, he was assured by the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Telephone Co. v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. CahillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
- Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. BrandonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
3Cited by15 opinions
- Chesapeake & Potomac Tel. Co. v. ClayCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Lannan Found. v. GingoldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Hudson v. AshleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Pearsall v. AlexanderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Friedman v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.