Legal Opinion

United States v. Valente

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided March 23, 1984No. ACM 24051PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

CANELLOS, Judge:

Before a general court-martial with members, the accused was convicted, contrary to his pleas, of burglary and larceny. The approved sentence extends to a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for 18 months, and total forfeitures.

On appeal, the accused asserts three errors for our consideration; we will discuss only one. That is, the military judge erred in refusing to grant immunity to K, a potential witness, so that the defense could examine him and possibly call him as a defense witness. Over defense objection, evidence was received in the prosecution’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Parker v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. VillinesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  4. United States v. KirschUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  5. United States v. GarrettU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. SwanNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
  2. United States v. SimpsonArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004
  3. United States v. MannU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1991
  4. United States v. BaranU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
  5. United States v. BaranUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API