Legal Opinion

National Contracting Co. v. Hudson River Water Power Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 5, 1907PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, the National Contracting Company, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, entered.in the office of the cleric of. the county of New York upon the report-of a referee, dismissing the complaint and awarding the sum of $386,185.07 upon the counterclaim.

1Opinion of the Court

Clarke, J.:

The action was brought to recover damages' for the defendant’s alleged breach of contract for the construction of a dam and power plant upon the Hudson river, in the counties of Saratoga and Warren, at a place known as Spier Falls. The defendant, claiming that the breach of contract had been by the plaintiff, pleaded as a counterclaim its damages resulting from said breach.

Upon a former trial the plaintiff recovered a judgment for the ' sum of $554,680.43. Upon appeal to this court said judgment was reversed and a new trial ordered before another referee. (110 App. Div. 13,3.)

The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Peace v. McAdooAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Moses v. AutuonoSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  2. Bacigalupi v. Phoenix Building & Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910
  3. Six Companies of California v. Joint Highway Dist. No. 13Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  4. Smith Sand & Gravel Co. v. CorbinWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Gay v. Hudson River Electric Power Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API