Legal Opinion
Gillespie v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 29, 1926No. 321PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMack, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). It was proven that whisky, bearing Canadian labels, was brought within the territorial waters and as to a part thereof remained on the boat when tied up to the soil of the United States, and as to another part was landed upon soil of the United States from the tug described on the night in question, and it was further proven that the men who either tied or surrendered when the first police party arrived at Gratwick’s were busied in landing the whisky. The jury could infer from these facts that all of these men were engaged in transporting and secreting the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Keck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Bailey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1925
- Nounes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1925
- United States v. CardwellDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1925
- United States v. JordanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1876
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- William L. Babb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- United States v. AlghazouliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Palmero v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
- Hartson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- United States v. Carlton Errol GodwinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.