Legal Opinion

United States v. Cardwell

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided December 1, 1925No. 10838PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, District Judge.

This cause is before the court on a motion by the defendant to set aside the verdict of guilty rendered against him herein and to arrest tho judgment of conviction entered on such verdict.

The indictment, which consists of one count, and purports in its caption to charge a violation of section 593(b) of the Tariff Act of 3922 (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 5841M3), alleges that the defendant, at a specified time and place, “did unlawfully, willfully, fraudulently, feloniously, and knowingly receive, buy, conceal, and facilitate the transportation and concealment of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. StafoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Nounes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
  2. Charles Zimmerman Sons Co. v. FergusonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1926
  3. West v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  4. United States v. NewtonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API