Legal Opinion

Palmero v. United States

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 28, 1940No. 3483PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAHONEY, Circuit Judge.

The defendants, appellants, were convicted on three separate indictments which were tried together. They were charged with aiding .and abetting in the unlawful importing and bringing into the United States of a certain quantity of gum opium, and aiding and abetting in concealing the same, in violation of the Narcotic Drugs Import and Export Act, Title 21, U.S.C.A. §§ 173, 174, and in violation of the Tariff Act of 3930, Title 19 U.S.C.A. § 1593(b), and with conspiracy to violate the Narcotic Drugs Import and Export Act.

Briefly the facts are as follows: On March 13,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Ford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Cunard Steamship Co. v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. United States v. YuginovichSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Keck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. Nestor Uribe, United States of America v. Leon Alberior Rave-Arias, United States of America v. David RashCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. KingDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1971
  3. United States v. MacDougallCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. KushnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  5. United States v. Richard M. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API