Legal Opinion

City of Bremerton v. Widell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 2002No. 67451-5PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

51 P.3d 733 (2002)

146 Wash.2d 561

CITY OF BREMERTON, Respondent,

v.

Karl WIDELL, and Larry Blunt, Petitioners.

No. 67451-5.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued November 27, 2001.

Decided June 6, 2002.

Rovang Fong & Associates, W. David Rovang, Eric M. Fong, Port Orchard, for petitioners.

WAPA, Pamela Loginsky, Deputy, Olympia, for respondent.

Raegen N. Rasnic, amicus curiae on behalf of American Civil Liberties Union.

Anna M. Laurie, amicus curiae on behalf of Bremerton Housing Authority.

Marya A. Gingrey, amicus curiae on behalf of Seattle Housing Authority.

Michael J. Mirra and Eleanor…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. American Legion Post 149 v. WASH. DEPT. OF HEALTHWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. American Legion Post No. 149 v. Department of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Ongom v. Dept. of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. ClinkenbeardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. State v. BergenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API