Legal Opinion

Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Dixon

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 25, 1976No. Appeal, 645 C.D. 1975PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

Frazier Dixon appeals from a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review adverse to his claim for unemployment compensation benefits. Mr. Dixon was declared ineligible for benefits for willful misconduct, pursuant to Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §802(e).

Mr. Dixon had worked for wages for Publicker Industries for 18 months prior to his discharge; his last duties were as an assistant machine operator. There is no evidence in this record that his work was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kentucky Fried Chicken of Altoona, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Secretary of Revenue v. John's Vending Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Gagliardi v. Ambridge BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Pocono Manor Ass'n v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Swartley v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hunter v. Port Authority of Allegheny CountySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Miller Brewing Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  3. Heitman v. Cronstroms Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Barnett v. Unempl. Comp. Bd. of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API