Global Landfill Agreement Group v. 280 Development Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
LETTER OPINION
POLITAN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the motion of defendant 280 Development Corporation (“280 Development”) to dismiss the claims against it by plaintiff, Global Landfill Agreement Group (“Agreement Group”), under CERCLA and the New Jersey Spill Act. The Court heard oral argument on the matter on December 22, 1997. Based upon the reasoning set forth more fully below, defendant’s motion to dismiss the claims is GRANTED, and the Amended Complaint is hereby DISMISSED AS TO 280 DEVELOPMENT GROUP.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
This is an action under sections 107 and 113…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Anthony J. Chipollini v. Spencer Gifts, Inc., a Delaware Corporation. Appeal of Anthony J. ChipolliniCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Robert G. Boyle v. The Governor's Veterans Outreach & Assistance CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Paper Systems Inc. v. Mitsubishi Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2000
- Edgardo Velazquez v. Wagner Industries, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026