Legal Opinion

Izen v. Catalina

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 29, 2001No. 99-21031PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

In late 1989, the IRS initiated an administrative proceeding to suspend Joe Alfred Izen, an attorney, from practicing before the IRS. Patrick McDonough, an attorney with the Office of Director of Practice (which is independent of the IRS), recommended that Izen be suspended because he had failed to timely file federal income tax returns for 1980, 1981, and 1982.

During this administrative disbarment proceeding, McDonough denied that the IRS was pursuing criminal charges against Izen. Relying on this statement, Izen testified before the administrative law judge. In late 1991, McDonough learned…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Siegert v. GilleySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Dwayne Taylor and Charles D. Dixon v. Greg Gregg and City of Lubbock, Texas, MunicipalityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. Beryl Eugene v. Alief Independent School District, Paula Conley and R.F. Griffin, Individually and in Their Official CapacitiesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Gordy v. BurnsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  2. Soon Phat, L.P. v. AlvaradoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2013
  3. Izen v. CatalinaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  4. Castellano v. FragozoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  5. Izen v. CatalinaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API