Legal Opinion
MS DEV. v. Auto Plaza of Woodhaven
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided March 18, 1997No. Docket 177764PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
Defendants* 1 Auto Plaza of Woodhaven (Woodhaven) and Auto Plaza of Southgate (South-gate) appeal as of right the order granting, pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(7), summary disposition for MS Development, Inc. (hereafter plaintiff), of defendants’ counterclaim. We affirm, but only because we are compelled to do so by the law of the case doctrine.
In 1987, Dan Dal Pian owned two-thirds of the stock in Woodhaven and Paul Rosati owned one-third. Dal Pian and Rosati each owned half the shares in Southgate. In addition, Dal Pian owned two-thirds of the stock in the M-59 Auto Plaza and Rosati owned the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re the Estate of RothkoNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Turner v. Mercy Hospitals & Health ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Freeman v. Dec International, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. CareyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stabley v. Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Park AuthorityMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Webb v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Huron Potawatomi, Inc v. StingerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Hatch v. Grand Haven Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998