Legal Opinion
King-Willmann Ex Rel. King v. Webster Groves School District
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided March 6, 2012No. SC 92125PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Per curiam
Jordan Danielle King-Willmann filed a petition seeking a writ of mandamus requiring the Webster Groves school district to enroll her in the district pursuant to section 167.131.2. 1 The school district contested certain material facts alleged by King-Willmann and asserted several defenses, including a claimed violation of the Hancock amendment, Mo. Const, art. X, sec. 21. Without holding an evidentiary hearing, as had been requested by the school district, the trial court issued a writ of mandamus granting King-Willmann relief. Because contested issues of fact ex ist, the judgment is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Eaton v. Mallinckrodt, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2007
- Fort Zumwalt School District v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
- Neske v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
- State ex rel. Board of Health Center Trustees v. County CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- American Federation of Teachers v. LedbetterSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- Breitenfeld v. School District of ClaytonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
- Timothy S. Pestka v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
- City of Normandy v. GreitensSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
- City of Slater, Missouri Municipal League,Christine Cates, Barbara Shaffer and Jacob K. Albarelli v. State of Missouri Office of State Courts Administrator Missouri Sheriff's Retirement SystemMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.