Legal Opinion

Breitenfeld v. School District of Clayton

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 11, 2013No. SC 92653PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARY R. RUSSELL, Judge.

This appeal follows this Court’s remand in Jane Turner, et al. v. School District of Clayton, et at., 318 S.W.3d 660 (Mo. banc 2010). At issue now is whether *820the trial court erred in concluding that the “Unaccredited District Tuition Statute,” section 167.181,1 is unenforceable as applied to the defendant school districts2 because it violates the Hancock Amendment, Missouri Constitution article X, sections 16 to 22.3 Also at issue is whether the trial court wrongly determined that section 167.131 is unenforceable as applied to the defendant school districts because…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. State v. NashSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  3. Boone County Court v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  4. Buchanan v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  5. Turner v. School District of ClaytonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Care & Treatment of Kirk v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  2. Armstrong-Trotwood, LLC v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  3. Cass Cnty. v. Dir. of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2018
  4. In the Adoption of K.M.W.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. State v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 2021

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API