Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Neylon v. Nebraska State Railway Commission

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1949No. 32514Published

1ConcurrenceSimmons, C. J.

I concur with the conclusion of the court. I would place the decision on the question submitted by the parties as to whether the order of December 26, 1947, was in effect a certificate of convenience and necessity or a procedural order' within the control of the commission. I would hold it to be merely a procedural order within the control of the commission.

By its terms section 75-238, R. S. 1943, is applicable only where a certificate of convenience and necessity has been issued. See Gregg Cartage & Storage Co. v. United States, 316 U. S. 74, 62 S. Ct. 932, 86 L. Ed. 1283. The verb “issue”…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Seatrain Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Gregg Cartage & Storage Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Hergott v. Nebraska State Railway CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Interstate Motor Transit Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Reynolds v. Alexandria Motor Bus Line, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API