Neylon v. Nebraska State Railway Commission
Nebraska Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceSimmons, C. J.
I concur with the conclusion of the court. I would place the decision on the question submitted by the parties as to whether the order of December 26, 1947, was in effect a certificate of convenience and necessity or a procedural order' within the control of the commission. I would hold it to be merely a procedural order within the control of the commission.
By its terms section 75-238, R. S. 1943, is applicable only where a certificate of convenience and necessity has been issued. See Gregg Cartage & Storage Co. v. United States, 316 U. S. 74, 62 S. Ct. 932, 86 L. Ed. 1283. The verb “issue”…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Seatrain Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Gregg Cartage & Storage Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Hergott v. Nebraska State Railway CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
- Interstate Motor Transit Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- Reynolds v. Alexandria Motor Bus Line, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.