Legal Opinion
PACKARD-BAMBERGER & CO., INC. v. Maloof
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 13, 1964PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
83 N.J. Super. 273 (1964)
199 A.2d 400
PACKARD-BAMBERGER & CO., INC., PLAINTIFF,
v.
JACK MALOOF, DEFENDANT.
JACK MALOOF, THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF,
v.
JAMES KHOURY, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided April 13, 1964.
Mr. Daniel Amster for plaintiff.
Mr. James A. Major for defendant (Messrs. Major & Major, attorneys).
Mr. John F. McCann, attorney for third-party defendant.
SCHNEIDER, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).
A motion for summary judgment has been made in the case of Packard-Bamberger & Co., Inc. v. Jack Maloof. The decision in the case of Maloof v. Khoury, based upon…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sobel v. DiatzCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Matlack v. ArendNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- Hamilton v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
- Stark v. Nat. Research and Design Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- Ottman, Trustees v. Albert Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Berkeley Dev. Co. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- Packard-Bamberger & Co., Inc. v. MaloofNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965