Ottman, Trustees v. Albert Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Maxey,
This appeal involves the same written instruments and cause of action as were before us in Ottman et al. v. Nixon-Nirdlinger et al., 301 Pa. 234, 151 A. 879. The decision in that case was upon the pleadings, and it was held that plaintiffs’ statement of claim made out a prima facie case entitling them to recover. Summary judg xueut for defendants upon a statutory demurrer was reversed and the case was remanded for trial. Upon the trial it appeared that the estate of Jules E. Mastbaum, deceased, had been improperly joined as a party defendant, instead of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Stewart v. . Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Pennsylvania Co. v. BergsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Sexton v. Chicago Storage Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Gillette Bros. v. Aristocrat Restaurant, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Craig v. SummersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Reamer's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- West End Tenants Ass'n v. George Washington UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Whitmer v. Bell Telephone Co. of Pa.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Rittenberg v. Donohoe Const. Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Morrisville Shopping Center, Inc. v. Sun Ray Drug Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.