Legal Opinion
Vaughan v. Oxenborg
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 13, 1962No. 39197PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Frankum, Judge.
Although various special demurrers to the petition were overruled, this ruling is not argued in this court and will be treated as abandoned. Thus, the issue is whether the plaintiff has alleged any fraudulent act on the part of the defendants by which he has been damaged, and whether his petition shows the necessary elements of an action for damages resulting from fraud under Code § 105-301.
As stated in Gaultney v. Windham, 99 Ga. App. 800, 806 (109 SE2d 914): “. . . the plaintiff must allege . . . the following essential ingredients: (1) the defendant made the representations;…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brown v. Ragsdale Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Alexander v. SearcySupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Coral Gables Corp. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
- Cosby v. AsherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
- Fowler v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Brown v. Techdata Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Simpson Consulting, Inc. v. Barclays Bank PLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Bogle v. BraggCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Seale v. MillerDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1988
- Shivers v. Sweda International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.