Legal Opinion

Hinkel v. Beiting

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fulton County

Decided September 13, 1949No. 32Published

1Opinion of the Court

Sheely, P. J.,

Pursuant to Pa. R. C. P. 1017 defendant has filed preliminary objections including a plea to the jurisdiction of the court, a motion for a more specific complaint, and a motion to strike off the complaint.

The plea to the jurisdiction raises the question of the service of the complaint upon defendant. Defendant is a nonresident and service was made under Pa. R. C. P. 2079(a) which provides that process may be served by having the sheriff “send by Registered Mail, return receipt requested, a true and attested copy of the *131process: (1) to the Secretary of the Commonwealth,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wuchter v. PizzuttiSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Park Brothers & Co. v. Oil City Boiler WorksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  3. Vaughn v. LoveSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Parsons Trading Co. v. DohanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Leonard v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API