Legal Opinion

City of Plant City v. Mann

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 25, 1981No. Nos. 58507, 58580PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADKINS, Justice.

We are asked to review order no. 9173 of the Public Service Commission directing Tampa Electric Company to refund the excess franchise fees collected under order no. 8511 between October 30, 1978, and December 1, 1979, to non-municipal customers. We approve the order of the Public Service Commission and deny the petition for writ of certiorari.

This litigation involves the method of collecting municipal franchise fees. The direct method places the financial burden for franchise fees on the resident customers of *953the municipality imposing the fee. The spread method distributes…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crichlow v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. Henry v. WhitehurstSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
  3. El Prado Restaurant, Inc. v. WeaverDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  4. City of Plant City v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1979

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Francisco Negron, Petita Negron, Cindy Negron, and Shirley Negron v. Nellie Hessing and George Hessing, her husbandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  2. Gooden v. City of Riviera BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  3. Smith v. AlmonteCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API