Legal Opinion

Crichlow v. Maryland Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 28, 1933PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

It is necessary to make a chronological statement of the events transpiring in this cause to the end that a reasonably clear conception of the controversy involved in the appeal may be obtained. The arrangement of the transcript of the record renders the work of presenting the real questions involved somewhat difficult. The solicitors themselves do not agree upon the statement of the case in their briefs, so the solicitor for the appellee deems it necessary because of the incompleteness, so he states, of appellants' statement to enlarge "somewhat on the detail of the facts disclosed by the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Alabama Hotel Co. v. J. L. Mott Iron WorksSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
  2. First National Bank v. DutcherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. City of St. Petersburg v. Pinellas County Power Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1924
  4. Dade County v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1919
  5. State v. County of GadsdenSupreme Court of Florida · 1912

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Waltham A. Condominium Ass'n v. Village Man., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  2. National Shawmut Bank of Boston v. WoodardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  3. Cleveland Mortgage & Investment Co. v. GageSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  4. A & B Discount Lumber & Supply, Inc. v. MitchellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  5. City of Plant City v. MannSupreme Court of Florida · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API