Campbell v. Johnson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the Western District of Washington. The defendant in error was the plaintiff in an action against the plaintiffs in error, who wore alleged to be partners doing a fraternal beneficiary business under the firm name of Seattle Typographical Union No. 202, organized under the laws of the state of Washington, with its chief office in the city of Seattle.
Read the full summary
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the Western District of Washington. The defendant in error was the plaintiff in an action against the plaintiffs in error, who wore alleged to be partners doing a fraternal beneficiary business under the firm name of Seattle Typographical Union No. 202, organized under the laws of the state of Washington, with its chief office in the city of Seattle. The complaint alleged that on October 31, 1905, and for many years prior thereto, the plaintiff in the action was a member in good and regular standing of the said…
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The plaintiffs in error contend that the Circuit Court was without jurisdiction of the action, for the' reason that it was not alleged in the amended complaint that the defendants therein were residents of the Western district of Washington, and because the amended complaint filed on April 6, 1907, alleged the citizenship of the parties in the present tense, and did not allege their citizenship at the time of the commencement of the action; citing Laskey et al. v. Newtown Mining Co. (C. C.) 56 Fed. 628. The objection that the complaint omits to allege the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. McBrideSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Mexican Central Railway Co. v. PinkneySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Western Loan & Savings Co. v. Butte & Boston Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Toledo Traction Co. v. CameronCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Eschman v. HuebnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1922
- Manning v. KennedyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943
- Cosentino v. GoldmanNew York Supreme Court · 1944