Legal Opinion
Martinez v. Dixon
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided October 31, 1985No. 84CA1199PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BABCOCK, Judge.
Defendants, Gerald Dixon (Dixon) and Stephan Boruchin (Boruchin), appeal the denial of their motions to vacate a default judgment and to quash a writ of garnishment. We affirm.
On July 1, 1980, Dixon executed a promissory note in favor of plaintiff, Marvin Martinez, which was due arid payable on January 1, 1981. The note was not paid when due, and Martinez sought judgment on it by complaint filed November 22, 1982. Although Dixon was duly served with summons and complaint, he failed to filé an answer or otherwise respond. Subsequently, a default judgment was obtained by Martinez…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mission Denver Co. v. PiersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Craig v. RiderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Atlas Const. Co. v. DIST. COURT IN AND FOR BOULDER CTY.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1979
- Riss v. Air Rental, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1957
- Ehrlinger v. ParkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United Bank of Boulder, N.A. v. BuchananColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- Board of Trustees of the Vacation Trust Carpenters Local No. 1780 v. Durable Developers, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1986
- Walk-In Medical Centers, Inc. v. Breuer Capital Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1991
- Anderson Boneless Beef, Inc. v. Sunshine Health Care Center, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1994
- Flanders Electric Motor Service, Inc. v. Davall Controls & EngineeringColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.